Have you ever stopped to consider how much easier your life would be if you had a simple transport option to rush you to your closest store and back? Look no further because between the Trek and Scott bikes, you are sure to find your choice roadie.
Regardless of whether you are 15 or 50, as long as you know how to cycle, are in good health and the weather is calm outside, a bicycle can and will transform the type and number of activities you can engage in.
Having added benefits in environment conservation and health and fitness, you can inspire your entire neighborhood to take it up as a hobby and end up with an unexpected team of cyclists.
The first step is finding the perfect choice roadie for you and then you can begin your new life as a cyclist.
What is the difference between Trek and Scott?
Model |
Trek |
Scott |
Brakes |
Shimano Hydraulic |
Shimano Hydraulic Disc |
Shifters |
Shimano Acera M371 |
Shimano Dura-Ace Di2 |
Saddle |
Bontrager H1 |
Syncros Belcarra V |
Stem |
SR Suntour NEX |
Foil Disc HMX |
Wheels |
Bontrager LT2 Comp |
Syncros Capital |
Check Availability |
Trek vs Scott – How do they compare?
Frame
Trek has a sleek and lightweightframe providingfar much better cushioning from road vibrationscompared to Scott’s frame with itsdetailed integration designed to keep all cabling tucked away. Â
Trek is built with grippy handlebars to eliminate any slippage or instability in control. With the weight of the bike under control, riders can get a good handle of their bike in all situations which boosts riding confidence.
With lesser weight, the bike also feels faster though this can only be attested by pro cyclists rather than a regular riding to and from home.
This is a bike that matches the road bike in geometry but with a shorter reach and a higher stack. This puts the rider in a comfortable riding position for the long distances they are covering.Â
Scott has created a striking aero design featuring a large tube located near the headset and bottom bracket.Â
This is the acclaimed lightweight road bike. It is built for climbing and racing. The model chooses to use only disc brakes to match with the trend now that favors rotor stoppers on both front and rear wheels.Â
Interesting details have been drawn on the seat-tube, the fork, and some style infused on the dropped seat stays.
ComponentsÂ
Scott uses the Shimano Di2 shifting which is not as supreme asTrek’s fitted with hydraulic brakes that are more resilient and effective in all-weather situations and guarantee superb control on the wheels.Â
The Shimano shifting cables have been conveniently tucked away and while it creates a very clean bike. However, it is tricky to use when making adjustments onit. This leads us to a bit of frustration in disconnecting and reconnecting cables when making realignments.
Syncros Capital disc wheels that are both aero-optimized and tubeless help the bike ride along. These wheels match with the bike’s frameset with no need for replacement.
Coupled with the Easy Fold 28mm tires, the bike is capable of racing through corners confidently. Comfort may be wanting in the Scott bike due to the high stem stack.
Trek’s wheels are Bontrager Tubeless-ready type which makes them super protective of the tires and resistant to punctures.Â
Users who like to adjust their tires will appreciate Trek’s larger clearance that can fit up to 35mm. The frame being light also adds to the bike’s ease of transportation and makes it ideal for travel or vacation.
The tires are all-terrain LT2 Comp Hard-Case which are puncture-resistant and it comes with tubeless rims. Other features are the ergonomic handlebars and the DuoTrap S app for wireless ride data monitoring and reporting.
Cranksets featured are the Shimano MT210 46/30 chainguard with Shimano Acera shifters that give you quick gear shifting with up to 9-speeds available.Â
Mudguards and racks are part of the bike assembly making the bikes a ready option to grab even when the roads are muddy or filled with debris.Â
Trek vs Scott – A Comparison OverviewÂ
Scott ReviewÂ
While it didn’t start as a bicycle manufacturer, Scott Sports is still one of the few brands that create equipment for various other sporting genres.Â
Founded in 1958, Scott made its mark in the cycling world in 1989 with the creation of the first aero handlebar whose design and efficiency saw it secure the win in that year’s Tour de France.Â
Then in 1995, it created the first carbon mountain bike, and later in 2007, Scott set a new record with the creation of the lightest road bike in the market.Â
They have since added more feats in their revolutionary bike designs and today, they have E-bikes and mountain bikes under their fold as well.Â
ProsÂ
- Incredibly fast
- Eye-catching anesthetics
- Near-perfect design Â
ConsÂ
- Missing power meter
Trek ReviewÂ
[amazon box=”B00HUSYKZQ” template=”horizontal” ]Trek gives you a range of bike models to choose from with varied standards and features that suit different preferences.
It is capable of accommodating an individual weighing up to 300 lbs and it comes with an Alpha Gold Aluminum frame, a carbon fork, and a drivetrain that is fast, reliable, and versatile.
You will find them sporting different geometry between the H1 and H2. The unique trait across the two is the longer and lower riding position they give the cyclist for better endurance over long distances.
The drivetrain is Shimano 2×9 offering 27-speeds and a wide range of gears meaning you don’t have to pedal hard or soft to get over hills. The brakes are hydraulic disc which is reliable in all weather conditions.
Pros
- Hydraulic lockout function
- Ease of accessorizing
- Wide gear range
- Internal cable routing
ConsÂ
- No kickstand
- Paint easily scratches off on gravel rides
ConclusionÂ
The Scott bikes are a great road bike option and Foil is an exciting example of a race bike to hop on that still makes them relevant. However, they are not as comfortable to go on long rides and their integrated design costs the practicality of the bike.
Trek bikes provide a strong, yet lightweight bike frame and offer the rider ultimate control over their bike’s handling. If your concern lies more on stability, pick on the Trek bikes.
Verdict: So, which is better – Trek or Scott?
Trek bikes are better than Scottbikes. This is because of the attention to detail that Trek puts into their bike frames which results in ergonomic frames that are ideal for city cruising and to an extent some tarmac racing.
If you want a bike that will take you from the office to the picnic in the park, the Trek bike is it.
FAQÂ
Are Trek bikes good for climbing?
Yes, they are. Even as this is an aero bike, it performs marvelously in climbs because of its Shimano Hydraulic Di2 mechanical system.
Are Scott Bikes suitable for both men and women?
Yes, it is. However, if you like to be bike specific, there is a women’s version as well but the only difference is that it is lighter in weight and it features a slightly different saddle.